Orbit Design Partner Program
This guide covers what feedback to send, how to A/B test so your feedback includes evidence, and where to send it.
The most persuasive feedback compares the same question with and without Orbit, in whichever surface your team uses: Duo and/or an external agent like Claude Code or Codex. A good A/B captures four things per run: wall time, tool calls, approximate tokens consumed, and the answer itself, followed by an assessment of which answer you would actually act on.
Claude Code: run this one command in your repo, then invoke /orbit-ab-test "your question":
mkdir -p .claude/skills/orbit-ab-test && curl -fsSL -o .claude/skills/orbit-ab-test/SKILL.md https://orbit-dp-program-3fc9a6.gitlab.io/resources/orbit-ab-test-skill.md
Other agents: download the skill file and paste its contents as instructions with your question.
The skill runs your question twice in isolated contexts, once with Orbit and once without, measures both runs, and produces a structured report: a comparison table, the agent's own scoring on completeness and groundedness, what one run found that the other missed, and a human verdict line for you to fill in.
The agent's self-scores are approximate. The line we weigh most is your human verdict: which answer would your engineer act on? Fill it in every time.
Before posting to the public epic, redact. The epic is world-readable. Remove private file paths, class and function names, repository names, and any code. Keep the shape of the finding ("a caller in a second repo was missed") and strip the identifying detail. If a finding can't be shared without exposing your code, bring it to the weekly sync instead.
Orbit Design Partner Program · Orbit is in Beta · Feedback epic: gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/orbit/-/work_items/4